On Friday, the team behind Lido put up a multi-leg vote system to determine whether or not the platform should limit itself to a share of staked ETH and, if so, how.
In its argument for limiting Ethereum staking, Lido proposed that the saturation of staked Ethereum towards one protocol poses an existential threat to the blockchain, giving the protocol more voting power. It would also allow newcomers to rise to meet the supply shortfall.
In the case of the possible risks from Lido limiting exposure, Lido argued that there is a risk that a centralized exchange-led KYC standard could dominate the market if it were to choose to limit its staking exposure. This could result in other liquid staking providers not being able to scale quickly enough to meet demand, causing a liquidity crunch.