Before outlining the underlying differences between both offerings; I would like to state that an STO comes attached alongside the token, investment assets such as real investments trusts (REIT), stocks, bonds and funds. That maybe offers a better picture of how different an STO is from an ICO. Meanwhile, there is yet a bigger difference, in terms of the benefits and limitations of each offering.
How different?
ICOs have a goal in mind to operate under an unregulated environment. The goal is to raise funds and positions the offering as utility tokens without speculation but usage. Therefore, investors place more value on the transformation features of the token. Meanwhile, the token circumvents regulations in a way that makes it possible to distribute user’s tokens through decentralized applications (DApps)/native apps. In most cases, an ICO will avoid regulation and registration with SEC.
On the other hand, STO organizers stage their offerings with regulatory structures in mind. In fact, STOs are 100% lawful because they are formed after meeting all legal requirements and are also registered with government bodies. To launch an STO, one has follow a series of upfront compliance work. Hence, it is right to say that it is more difficult to launch an STO than it is launching an ICO.
Furthermore, an STO is not everyone’s business because only accredited regulatory compliant investors/companies can sell or purchase security tokens.
Advantages of ICOs
Advantages of STOs
Disadvantages of ICOs
Disadvantages of STOs
As you can see, the pros and cons are quite clear and will help you make an informed decision; depending on your level of risk tolerance.