Alderoty highlighted that the SEC's case primarily hinged on allegations that Ripple's sales of XRP constituted unregistered securities offerings. However, the court's prior ruling clarified that XRP itself is not a security, and the SEC ultimately chose to dismiss the claims against the executives.
The Ripple CLO suggested that the SEC's decision to drop the charges against Garlinghouse and Larsen was a strategic move. He implied that pursuing the case against the executives became less compelling after the court's partial victory for Ripple regarding programmatic sales of XRP on exchanges.
The dismissal of charges against Ripple's executives is viewed as a significant step towards greater regulatory clarity for XRP and the broader cryptocurrency industry in the United States. It reinforces the notion that the manner in which a digital asset is sold is crucial in determining its regulatory status.