The order has ignited a firestorm among free speech advocates and legal experts who argue that due process was not upheld. Ripple CTO David Schwartz publicly criticized the decision, calling it “the worst legal take of all time.” Schwartz’s remark drew a contentious response on social media, leading to his humorous reply: “Ripple is always hiring.” Attorney Laura Powell also weighed in, citing multiple legal concerns with Judge Rebull’s directive, particularly its potential conflicts with constitutional rights.
Opinions about the ruling are split. Some argue it’s necessary to protect individual reputations, while others, including prominent XRP supporter Bill Morgan, defend Schwartz’s stance, underscoring the importance of upholding free speech rights. The case also brings to light Hyman’s father’s legal background, with Daoud facing past accusations of bribery, adding another layer of complexity to the narrative.
As the debate unfolds, this case underscores the intricate balance between individual reputation protection and free speech, spotlighting the challenges that arise when legal orders intersect with online expression.