The debate over XRP’s classification has raged for years. While the SEC has long accused Ripple of selling unregistered securities, a 2023 ruling by Judge Analisa Torres determined that secondary sales of XRP do not qualify as securities transactions. This decision weakened the SEC’s case against Ripple but has done little to ease skepticism among Bitcoin maximalists. Many critics argue that XRP’s centralized governance structure makes it unsuitable for strategic financial roles, particularly in light of its recent inclusion in the U.S. Crypto Strategic Reserve.
The announcement that XRP would join a multi-token U.S. crypto reserve has sparked further debate. While Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse supports a diversified approach, critics like Rochard remain unconvinced, questioning why XRP should be part of a government-backed reserve when its utility and investor rights are so limited. This controversy has deepened the divide between Bitcoin advocates—who favor a Bitcoin-only reserve—and proponents of a multi-asset strategy. The ongoing discussions highlight the broader challenges of integrating digital assets into traditional financial systems.