The SEC's amended complaint no longer asks the court to determine whether certain tokens, including SOL, are securities. Despite this, the SEC continues to refer to these tokens as securities in other lawsuits, such as the one involving Coinbase. This indicates that the regulatory body's stance on these tokens remains consistent across different cases.
Miles Jennings, general counsel at a16z Crypto, explained that the SEC's decision might be influenced by the different judicial perspectives in the Binance and Coinbase cases. Judge Amy Berman Jackson, presiding over the Binance case, set a high bar for applying the Howey test to secondary transactions, making it less worthwhile for the SEC to pursue. Conversely, Judge Katherine Polk Failla in the Coinbase case appears more inclined to agree with the SEC's position, prompting the regulatory body to focus its efforts there.
Jennings speculates that the SEC's actions may be driven by political motives, informed by insights into the agency's internal behavior. He remains unconvinced that the SEC has made a strong enough case to link token sales on secondary markets to the managerial efforts of token issuers.
The SEC's lawsuit against Binance initially claimed that several tokens, including Solana, BNB, Cardano, Polygon, Sandbox, MANA, and Axie Infinity, were securities. In total, the SEC has labeled at least 68 tokens as securities, impacting over $100 billion worth of cryptocurrencies.
This ongoing legal battle highlights the complexities and uncertainties surrounding the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities, with significant implications for the market and its participants. As the SEC continues its enforcement actions, the crypto community remains watchful of the evolving regulatory landscape.